Data Analsis - Systemetric Measures

* Please click on the above picture for a clearer view

So our final statement,

There is a positive strong relationship between lenth of forearm and feet.

And we reject our null hypothesis.

Data Analysis - Linear Regression

* Please click on the above picture for a clearer view

With reference to the coeffiecient table,

C ( Y intercept) = 0.823

M = 0.996 ( Positve Gradient )

Linear equation:

y = mx + c

y = 0.996x + 0.823

Data Analysis - Pearson's R

* Please click on the above picture for a clearer view

From the above table,

Pearson's R = 0.770

Since P = 0.005 , we take the Level of significant (P) as 0.05

N = 30 (sample size is 30)

Therefore, P is more than 0.05 hence we reject our null hypothesis.

Also since R = 0.770,

There is a positive strong significant relationship between the length of the forearm and the feet.

Data Analysis - Best Fit Line

*Please click the above picture for a clearer view

Through the best fit line in this scatter plot, we can see that there is a positive relationship between the length of the forearm and the length of the feet.


As you can see, there is one point that is much deviated from the rest of the points.
This is because when we take a look at our raw data, we found out that the difference of length between their hand and feet usually range between 0 - 2.35 cm. However, there was this particular participant whose difference between he's forearm and feet was not within that range, instead it was 4.1 cm.
Therefore, he could be the reason why that one point is really deviated from the rest.

So as a group, we thought about it to see if we could have cause that wrong reading.
But we realized soon after that we made no mistake during the data collection.
Because all of us made sure that the people measuring the participants, followed what we had plan during our planning for data collection. All of us witness that they measured the reading twice consistently with the same measuring instrument and at the standardization landmarks. Hence we decided to see our lecturer to ask if this plot if ok.
To our relieved, she said it was ok and told us maybe the data is just like that.

Data Analysis - Scatter Plot

*Please click the above picture for a clearer view

To find out if there is a relationship between the length of the forearm and the length of the foot , we do a scatter plot

Raw Data Collected

*Please click the above picture for a clearer view

After doing our data collection, we proceed to do our data analysis.

Our data collected is a scale data.
First, we would like to show our raw data first.

Legend For Our Raw Data:

Hand1 - hand measured the first time
Hand2- hand measured the second time
AverageHand - average measurement between hand measurement 1 and hand measurement 2
Feet1- feet measured the first time
Feet2 - feet measured the second time
AverageFeet - average measurement between feet measurement 2 and feet measurement 2

Data Collection

We got ourselves a room and we were equipped with our measuring instrument,
So we began our quest for the data collection...

We uploaded some of the pictures to show our process of data collection.

He was responsible introducing who we were and what were we doing.

He looked out for any one walking pass the room.
Inviting them in.



She was all prepared to measure feets.
Along the way she had to bear some awful smelling feets.
But she just shrug it off and smile pretending she did not smell anything.



He was our first participant.


After his participation, he asked for a sweet in which we did not have any.
We could only thank him and aplogise for not having any sweet.




So, one of us went to the library cafe to get some sweets.



These were the sweets which all the participants loved.

The guy who asked for a sweet came soon walk by again but this time with his friend.
So we invited the friend to help us.

And yes, we did give him a sweet in the end.

When one of us aproached them, they were abit shocked.

But after inviting them in and doing the measurement,

the participants lighten up and were gadly to help us.

They were even making conversation with us

The most common question we got was why the nursing course is taking statistics.

One of the group member was assigned to record all the measurement.

The participants were really cooperative.

She got tired sitting down.

Kudos for her for tolerating some smelly feets.

The measuring continues...

Soon we were gathering alot of data.

The people measuring had to focus real hard because we want accurate readings.

They stopped for awhile to pose for a picture.

They were in charge for measuring the forearm.

We were able to get alot of participant.

And the measuring still continues...

When we told them we need to take their picture,

most strongly protest that they do not want their face to be taken.

They claimed they do not want to be known.

So we told them their identify is kept strictly confidential.

This participant walked by.
He asked why were his friends that walked out of the room given sweet.
So we explained to him that they had helped us to do some study
and that the sweet was a token of appreciation.
And after that, we invited him to help us to the study.
Which he gladly accepted the invitation.

He walked away smiling after that.
We guessed sweets just made people happy.

Reflection:

Difficulties:
In the beginning, it was very hard for us to get participants because for the first 5 minutes there was nobody walking by. It became even harder when the crowd slowly walked by because we did not know how to approach them at first. But we preserved and braved ourselves to do it. Soon, we had no problem doing our study.

What we felt as a group:
This project really requires the whole group to work together. We tried to make sure that each of the members were given a specific task so that the study will go on smoothly. We guessed our only mistake was that we did not consider during our planning that we should give a token of appreciation to our fellow participants. Even though we only realize this mistake after our first participant commented, we listened to his feedback and discussed about it as a group. We figured he was right so we wasted no time in redeeming ourselves by going out to get sweets. Listening to the participant feedback really helped because for the rest of the participants involved, they were very happy to receive that small piece of token of appreciation.

Planning for Data Collection

Before we do our data collection, we decided to sit down and discuss what was relevant for this study.

Collection Data:

Accidental sampling.

We picked a library discussion room near the health science faculty to do our study.
This because we find that the area is pack with people walking to and fro.
We shall use the room to do our measurement and the corridor to get people who happen to be there for our study

Data samples:

30 people

The samples - Conceptualization:

Foot - Tip of the longest toe to the back of the feet.

Forearm - Tip of the wrist to the elbow

Special point we decided to take note of is:

Make sure the particpant study do not have any accessories on the point of reading to provide an accurate reading.

For Autonomy - research ethics:

Before we do this study, we must obtain their consent first.

What do we use to measure? - Operationalization

Identical measuring tape.

Cardboard.

How often to we measure?

Twice. And we will be taking the average reading.

Sweets were given to the participants as our token of appreciation.

Measuring tape placed in the file to provide rest for the back of the foot

To further ensure accurate reading,

a hard cardboard is placed directly on the tip of the toes

before the measurement is taken.

We used an identical measuring tape to measure the length of the forearm.
A hard cardboard is being used also to ensure accurate reading.
It is placed on the marking for the forearm



A camera 5 megapixel phone to take pictures through out the study.


All measurements taken were written down.

So with planning done,

data collection can now begin.